Tag Archives: marketing

Health Groups Ask Nickelodeon to Limit Junk Food Ads

My in my Nickelodeon days—I'm the one freaking out in the orange bow

My in my Nickelodeon/Nick Jr. days—I’m the one freaking out in the orange bow

Though I don’t have TV now, I watched a lot of Nickelodeon as a kid, and some of the commercials are almost as memorable as the shows themselves. Because it was the late 80′s, early 90′s, I also remember being told every few hours that you can’t get AIDS from sharing a hot dog with someone.

Memory certainly is a strange thing, isn’t it?

Of the commercials that I remember most clearly, cereal and fruit snacks advertisements top the list. Though it’s been a while since I’ve watched children’s TV, it’s hardly news that the marketing of junk food to children hasn’t gotten any better.

More than 80 health groups, doctors, and nutritionists  just sent a letter urging Nickelodeon and its parent company, Viacom, to adopt stricter standards for its advertisers to children. On her blog, Food Politics, Marion Nestle, who was among the letter-writers, discusses the need for such standards and other efforts to develop guidelines.

What do you think of food advertisements on children’s television networks and/or food marketing to kids? 

Thanks for the coupons, but…

Perhaps I’m a little bit paranoid after reading this article in the New York Times Magazine last weekend, but I have to wonder what suddenly made the Whole Foods I’ve been shopping at for four years start thinking I’m feeding a family. Is it that I started buying organic milk this year? 

Thanks for the coupons, Whole Foods, but please don’t rush me.

I don’t even know what to make of the Victoria’s Secret catalog I got recently that was addressed to the Cording Family. It must be the lacy stuff I ordered when it was on sale back in November…Ew. Now I’m a little creeped out. Time to stop thinking about it.

Do you ever get weird coupons? 

Have you tried the new Peanut Butter Cheerios?

I don’t know what it is this week, but I’ve had cereal on the brain—cereal monogamy, to be specific. For someone who writes about food so much, sometimes my own living-under-a-rock-ness astounds me. For example, I had no idea there were so many varieties of Cheerios out there. Chocolate? Dulche de Leche? Peanut Butter?  I’m intrigued.

Because I’m kind of a nerd, I wanted to check these out online before adding them to my shopping list. I’m glad I did. While I’m all for whole grain cereal, and the nutrition stats and ingredient lists are not completely terrifying, sugar is still one of the first four ingredients  for most of these flavors (corn syrup, brown rice syrup, and other sweeteners are also on the list). The artificial coloring is kind of a drag too.

I’m sure I’m not the first to say it seems like there’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing thing going on, with sugary cereals basking in the “healthy glow” shoppers associate with Cheerios. Okay, that’s a little melodramatic, but you know what I mean. It’s only cereal, I know, but it still bugs me to see artificial stuff on the list. Continue reading

New Campaign Says Milk Can Help Treat PMS

PMS is one of those things that is at once a little uncomfortable to talk about, a big freaking deal, and a potentially lucrative marketing tie-in. 

A new campaign from the California Milk Processor Board (CMPB) attempts to appeal to both women suffering from PMS and the people around them by milk may help alleviate the symptoms of PMS. There’s also a Web site — Everything I Do is Wrong.org — and a social-media campaign. In California, there are billboards as well as radio and print ads.

Though it can be hard to quantify changes in PMS symptoms in a research setting, several studies have demonstrated a link between calcium supplementation and reduced symptoms. High intake of calcium-rich foods has also been shown to have a preventive effect.

This is a topic I’ve been reading a lot about lately. Out of all the nutrients studied for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome, the evidence for calcium seems to be particularly consistent.

I’m curious to hear what others think about the way this ad presents that information. At first glance, my reaction was, “Yeah, yeah. Another PMS joke—are you really gonna make my murderous monthly rage into a campaign for milk?” But then I realized that it’s funny because it’s true. One thing I hope consumers take into consideration though is that its’ not just milk that may alleviate and prevent PMS symptoms—there’s also yogurt, cheese, and fortified nondairy beverages. I couldn’t find any research on whether calcium-rich vegetables like broccoli have been studied, but no reason not to include those too!

What’s your favorite calcium-rich food?

Mine is definitely yogurt—aka the #1 Reason I Will Never Be A Vegan

one of my many yogurt bowls/messes

FTC Releases Principles of Food Marketing to Children

The FTC finally released its highly anticipated proposed Principles of Food Marketing to Children today. These principles, which are currently open for comment, apply to children between the ages of 2 and 17 and are slotted to go into effect in 2016.

The proposal is designed to encourage children, through advertising and marketing, to choose foods that make a meaningful contribution to a healthful diet and contain at least one of the following:

  • fruit
  • vegetable
  • whole grain
  • fat-free of low-fat dairy
  • fish
  • extra lean meat or poultry
  • eggs
  • nuts and seeds
  • beans

Additionally, the foods advertised should contain minimal amounts of nutrients that have a negative impact on health or weight, including:

  • saturated fat
  • trans fat
  • added sugars
  • sodium
One thing to note is that these principles are voluntary, not mandatory. Perhaps that’s why there is nothing to be seen about how food companies might be held accountable for their marketing to children. While I think these principles are encouraging, it would be great to see something a little more ballsy. 

Annoying Yogurt Commercials

On the list of reasons I do not own a TV and prefer to download my 30-Rock through Netflix:

*Cable Bills
*Bad Reality TV
*Yogurt Commercials

Many of you who know me in person have heard me rant about how much yogurt commercials annoy me, especially the ones with women in them, which is basically the only kind of yogurt commercial you see anymore…

It’s the way they target women by either exposing or alluding to various insecurities and then shove them this product specifically engineered for them so that they can indulge in their base desires or meet their embarrassing needs while still fitting into the socially-acceptable female behavior mold.

Don’t even get me started on the whole “yogurt is the official food of women” thing. It’s a shame because I love yogurt—the good, plain, real-food version—but it nags at me that there are these big companies out there trying to get me to buy more of it. The fewer calories, the better! Because all women are “supposed” to be on a diet, right?

I know that plain, nonfat or low-fat yogurt you buy in a big container doesn’t sell as well as these cutely packaged, super-sweet weight-management products, but seriously, why can’t we just treat yogurt as what it is—A nutritious food that fits very nicely within a balanced diet?

Here are a few commercials that especially tick me off:

Never mind

I feel kind of like a dope now for actually believing for a split-second that the FTC’s December 15 forum on food marketing to kids and the proposal that I blogged about a few days ago might actually hold some promise. It never fails to amaze me how one source of media will paint a completely different picture from another. I guess during finals week I was a bit lazy about not checking various sources of important stories. Haha but at least finals are over now and I have no excuse!

If you’ve never read Marion Nestle’s blog, Food Politics, or any of her books for that matter, I’d recommend having a look—I find what she writes eye-opening. I went back a few entries today and found some more specifics on what exactly the group proposal (which I posted about a few days ago) entailed.

I’d read that it proposed restrictions on saturated fat, trans fat, sugar, and sodium for foods marketed to children, but what I hadn’t seen was what those limits were: 1 gram saturated fat or less per serving and not more than 15% of total calories; less than half a gram of trans fat per serving; no more than 13 grams of sugar per serving; and no more than 200 mg of sodium per serving.

You don’t have to be a student of dietetics to see that there are a lot, a lot of unhealthy foods can still meet these guidelines. Not only that, but there’s still a lot of discrepancy over what a serving size should be in the first place. Besides that, there’s a whole slew of other hazy details complicating the matter. Talk about a mess. While I’m glad the issue is getting some attention (not that it hasn’t been getting attention), it’s disheartening to see some of the ways in which food companies get around regulations both in place and proposed.

Federal Group Seeks to Cut Food Advertising to Children

A federal group created by Congress is looking to restrict food marketing to children to include only foods that provide “a meaningful contribution to a healthful diet,” according to their proposal. This group also wants to limit the advertising of foods and beverages high in sugar, sodium, and saturated fat, which they feel contribute to childhood obesity.

The recommendations this group is working on will be sent to Congress next year after a public comment period.

I would really like to see something like this go into effect. It drives me nuts how aggressively unhealthy foods are pushed on children, and it would be wonderful to see the government do something to curb that. What a concept.

Check out this Wall Street Journal article for more info.

General Mills to Reduce Sugar in Cereal

About time! General Mills announced Wednesday that it plans to reduce the amount of sugar in 10 of their kids’ cereals.

For example, the added sugars in Cocoa Puffs could reportedly be reduced by 25% of the original level and 18% off the current level along with an increase in whole grains and nutrients. Some other cereals that are said to be getting the same treatment are Trix and Lucky Charms.

Last year, Kellogg’s reduced the sugars in some of their cereals such as Apple Jacks, Froot Loops, and Corn Pops, and Post also plans to retune some of their cereals this year as well. Fruity and Cocoa Pebbles are due for a makeover, apparently.

I can’t help wondering just how they plan to reduce the sugar while retaining their token sweet flavor. While it’s possible they can probably get by using less and counting on kids not to notice too much, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn they’re using some other kind of sweetener.

While sugary, low-fiber cereals aren’t necessarily the best choices, they’re better than a lot of other ready-to-eat foods kids might grab on their way out the door (aka, pop tarts, donuts), especially when consumed with milk. Unlike sugar, kids’ and teenagers’ diets are much lower in milk than they used to be.

Anyone hear about how the dairy industry’s “Raise Your Hand For Chocolate Milk” campaign? I have mixed feelings about it. While it’s true that some kids probably wouldn’t drink pre-sweetened milk and any milk may be better than none, I don’t think we should ascribe that belief to all children. I think this practice of marketing sugary products and other “kid” foods to children should stop. Kids are allowed to drink milk and eat real, whole foods that adults do.

That said, I did just make myself a soy-milk hot chocolate…Once in a while, a treat like that is nice—just a tablespoon of a high-quality organic mix that actually has real cocoa powder in it is all you really need to add. It’s the artificial stuff we’re telling our kids they like better than everything else is what I have a problem with.

On the other hand, I think that if schools get rid of chocolate milk, then maybe they should also get rid of sodas and sugary juices. While chocolate milk may not be as great a choice as regular milk, I think it’s usually a better option than a drink that won’t even give you any nutrients (aside from calories) with all that sugar.

Cookie Diet? Seriously?

I’m sorry, I can’t believe that there’s anybody out there even prescribing a “cookie diet,” yet it turns out there are quite a few: Dr. Siegal’s Cookie Diet, Smart For Life, and the Hollywood Cookie Diet are a few of the most popular programs.

You heard me right: eat pre-packaged cookies (engineered with substances such as glycerine and protein powder) and then have a token “sensible dinner” of lean protein and veggies—all for 800-1,200 calories a day.

Duh, if you take in fewer calories than you burn, you’re going to lose weight, but intakes that low can send your body into starvation mode and throw off your metabolism. I am not a fan of single-ingredient diets or diets that require you to purchase special products.

I wish there was a way to convince people that the best way to lose weight (“and keep it off!”) or improve their health is by learning how to make small effective changes that can lead to the results they want. You can’t get that from a flippin’ cookie.

This Wall Street Journal article takes a look at this weird eating plan.

That said, a well-balanced “cookie” makes a much better snack or quick breakfast than a candy bar or pastry. Check out this recipe for a no-bake breakfast cookie you can make ahead and grab on your way out the door. Homemade almost always beats pre-packaged.